You realize of course, this means war.

New from the RIAA:

Now, in an unusual case in which an Arizona recipient of an RIAA letter has fought back in court rather than write a check to avoid hefty legal fees, the industry is taking its argument against music sharing one step further: In legal documents in its federal case against Jeffrey Howell, a Scottsdale, Ariz., man who kept a collection of about 2,000 music recordings on his personal computer, the industry maintains that it is illegal for someone who has legally purchased a CD to transfer that music into his computer.
...
The Howell case was not the first time the industry has argued that making a personal copy from a legally purchased CD is illegal. At the Thomas trial in Minnesota, Sony BMG's chief of litigation, Jennifer Pariser, testified that "when an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." Copying a song you bought is "a nice way of saying 'steals just one copy,' " she said.

But lawyers for consumers point to a series of court rulings over the last few decades that found no violation of copyright law in the use of VCRs and other devices to time-shift TV programs; that is, to make personal copies for the purpose of making portable a legally obtained recording.

Y'know what RIAA, bring it on. I never bought the argument that all music should be free or the like, intellectual property has a reasonable basis. But I am sick of companies trying to twist intellectual property laws so it protects them and hurts the public interest. I don't want the RIAA to get smart about this, I won't them to go bankrupt and be replaced by companies that adapt to the new model. Their lawsuit-based reign of terror has gone on for too long.

Via korgmeister.