Noah Millman of the American Scene has a spectacular review of Hamlet as staged at the Stratford Festival. I would love to catch that staging, although I doubt I will. Nonetheless, this is the best piece of criticism I’ve read in a while and I read a fair amount of good criticism.
A sample:
Why do we take to Hamlet [the character]?
The false but easy way to make the necessary connection with the audience is simply to make Hamlet more appealing – play him as less brutal to Ophelia than the text directs; cut lines that play up his brutality; and so forth. The more true but also too easy way to make the connection is to play up Hamlet’s weakness, his psychic vulnerability – make us believe that, on some level, he really is mad. Carlson takes the harder, truest route, and aims to win us over by sheer display of intelligence. His Hamlet is peevish and dispeptic, but he runs rings around everyone else in the play. He does not want to be alone, but he is alone, perforce, and that loneliness has made him bitter. And you can see him, over and over again, trying to find someone who will not disappoint him, and finds only Horatio...
Read the whole thing.
The blog itself, the American Scene, is one of the conservative/libertarian blogs I read for good writing and insight into that part of the opposition that argues in good faith. This sort of piece is my reward.
Recent Comments